5049b4272e
* Policies were put under a new module (Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.Policy instead of Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF), but this wasn't changed in the Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF @mrf_config_descriptions * I don't have a unit test to prevent similar problems in the future because I don't find a proper way to do it * The descriptions in the unit tests are defined in the unit tests, so if someone changes module names in the code, the tests wont see it * The list is generated in Pleroma.Docs.Generator.list_behaviour_implementations, but I can't do a check in the when clause of the function to see if the provided module is a behaviour or not.
169 lines
4.8 KiB
Elixir
169 lines
4.8 KiB
Elixir
# Pleroma: A lightweight social networking server
|
|
# Copyright © 2017-2021 Pleroma Authors <https://pleroma.social/>
|
|
# SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-only
|
|
|
|
defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF do
|
|
require Logger
|
|
|
|
@behaviour Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.PipelineFiltering
|
|
|
|
@mrf_config_descriptions [
|
|
%{
|
|
group: :pleroma,
|
|
key: :mrf,
|
|
tab: :mrf,
|
|
label: "MRF",
|
|
type: :group,
|
|
description: "General MRF settings",
|
|
children: [
|
|
%{
|
|
key: :policies,
|
|
type: [:module, {:list, :module}],
|
|
description:
|
|
"A list of MRF policies enabled. Module names are shortened (removed leading `Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.` part), but on adding custom module you need to use full name.",
|
|
suggestions: {:list_behaviour_implementations, Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.Policy}
|
|
},
|
|
%{
|
|
key: :transparency,
|
|
label: "MRF transparency",
|
|
type: :boolean,
|
|
description:
|
|
"Make the content of your Message Rewrite Facility settings public (via nodeinfo)"
|
|
},
|
|
%{
|
|
key: :transparency_exclusions,
|
|
label: "MRF transparency exclusions",
|
|
type: {:list, :string},
|
|
description:
|
|
"Exclude specific instance names from MRF transparency. The use of the exclusions feature will be disclosed in nodeinfo as a boolean value.",
|
|
suggestions: [
|
|
"exclusion.com"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
@default_description %{
|
|
label: "",
|
|
description: ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@required_description_keys [:key, :related_policy]
|
|
|
|
def filter(policies, %{} = message) do
|
|
policies
|
|
|> Enum.reduce({:ok, message}, fn
|
|
policy, {:ok, message} -> policy.filter(message)
|
|
_, error -> error
|
|
end)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def filter(%{} = object), do: get_policies() |> filter(object)
|
|
|
|
@impl true
|
|
def pipeline_filter(%{} = message, meta) do
|
|
object = meta[:object_data]
|
|
ap_id = message["object"]
|
|
|
|
if object && ap_id do
|
|
with {:ok, message} <- filter(Map.put(message, "object", object)) do
|
|
meta = Keyword.put(meta, :object_data, message["object"])
|
|
{:ok, Map.put(message, "object", ap_id), meta}
|
|
else
|
|
{err, message} -> {err, message, meta}
|
|
end
|
|
else
|
|
{err, message} = filter(message)
|
|
|
|
{err, message, meta}
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def get_policies do
|
|
Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf, :policies], [])
|
|
|> get_policies()
|
|
|> Enum.concat([Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.HashtagPolicy])
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
defp get_policies(policy) when is_atom(policy), do: [policy]
|
|
defp get_policies(policies) when is_list(policies), do: policies
|
|
defp get_policies(_), do: []
|
|
|
|
@spec subdomains_regex([String.t()]) :: [Regex.t()]
|
|
def subdomains_regex(domains) when is_list(domains) do
|
|
for domain <- domains, do: ~r(^#{String.replace(domain, "*.", "(.*\\.)*")}$)i
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
@spec subdomain_match?([Regex.t()], String.t()) :: boolean()
|
|
def subdomain_match?(domains, host) do
|
|
Enum.any?(domains, fn domain -> Regex.match?(domain, host) end)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def describe(policies) do
|
|
{:ok, policy_configs} =
|
|
policies
|
|
|> Enum.reduce({:ok, %{}}, fn
|
|
policy, {:ok, data} ->
|
|
{:ok, policy_data} = policy.describe()
|
|
{:ok, Map.merge(data, policy_data)}
|
|
|
|
_, error ->
|
|
error
|
|
end)
|
|
|
|
mrf_policies =
|
|
get_policies()
|
|
|> Enum.map(fn policy -> to_string(policy) |> String.split(".") |> List.last() end)
|
|
|
|
exclusions = Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions])
|
|
|
|
base =
|
|
%{
|
|
mrf_policies: mrf_policies,
|
|
exclusions: length(exclusions) > 0
|
|
}
|
|
|> Map.merge(policy_configs)
|
|
|
|
{:ok, base}
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def describe, do: get_policies() |> describe()
|
|
|
|
def config_descriptions do
|
|
Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.Policy
|
|
|> Pleroma.Docs.Generator.list_behaviour_implementations()
|
|
|> config_descriptions()
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def config_descriptions(policies) do
|
|
Enum.reduce(policies, @mrf_config_descriptions, fn policy, acc ->
|
|
if function_exported?(policy, :config_description, 0) do
|
|
description =
|
|
@default_description
|
|
|> Map.merge(policy.config_description)
|
|
|> Map.put(:group, :pleroma)
|
|
|> Map.put(:tab, :mrf)
|
|
|> Map.put(:type, :group)
|
|
|
|
if Enum.all?(@required_description_keys, &Map.has_key?(description, &1)) do
|
|
[description | acc]
|
|
else
|
|
Logger.warn(
|
|
"#{policy} config description doesn't have one or all required keys #{
|
|
inspect(@required_description_keys)
|
|
}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
acc
|
|
end
|
|
else
|
|
Logger.debug(
|
|
"#{policy} is excluded from config descriptions, because does not implement `config_description/0` method."
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
acc
|
|
end
|
|
end)
|
|
end
|
|
end
|