Improve readability
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee26f2c91b
commit
ad09bdb376
6 changed files with 33 additions and 29 deletions
|
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Config.DeprecationWarnings do
|
|||
def check_simple_policy_tuples do
|
||||
has_strings =
|
||||
Config.get([:mrf_simple])
|
||||
|> Enum.any?(fn {_, v} -> Enum.any?(v, fn e -> is_binary(e) end) end)
|
||||
|> Enum.any?(fn {_, v} -> Enum.any?(v, &is_binary/1) end)
|
||||
|
||||
if has_strings do
|
||||
Logger.warn("""
|
||||
|
@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Config.DeprecationWarnings do
|
|||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def check_quarantined_instances_tuples do
|
||||
has_strings =
|
||||
Config.get([:instance, :quarantined_instances]) |> Enum.any?(fn e -> is_binary(e) end)
|
||||
has_strings = Config.get([:instance, :quarantined_instances]) |> Enum.any?(&is_binary/1)
|
||||
|
||||
if has_strings do
|
||||
Logger.warn("""
|
||||
|
@ -119,8 +118,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Config.DeprecationWarnings do
|
|||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def check_transparency_exclusions_tuples do
|
||||
has_strings =
|
||||
Config.get([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions]) |> Enum.any?(fn e -> is_binary(e) end)
|
||||
has_strings = Config.get([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions]) |> Enum.any?(&is_binary/1)
|
||||
|
||||
if has_strings do
|
||||
Logger.warn("""
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.RejectNonPublic do
|
|||
|
||||
@impl true
|
||||
def describe,
|
||||
do: {:ok, %{mrf_rejectnonpublic: Config.get(:mrf_rejectnonpublic) |> Enum.into(%{})}}
|
||||
do: {:ok, %{mrf_rejectnonpublic: Config.get(:mrf_rejectnonpublic) |> Map.new()}}
|
||||
|
||||
@impl true
|
||||
def config_description do
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -262,14 +262,16 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy do
|
|||
|
||||
mrf_simple_excluded =
|
||||
Config.get(:mrf_simple)
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, v} -> {k, Enum.reject(v, fn {v, _} -> v in exclusions end)} end)
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {rule, instances} ->
|
||||
{rule, Enum.reject(instances, fn {host, _} -> host in exclusions end)}
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|
||||
mrf_simple =
|
||||
mrf_simple_excluded
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, v} ->
|
||||
{k, Enum.map(v, fn {instance, _} -> instance end)}
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {rule, instances} ->
|
||||
{rule, Enum.map(instances, fn {host, _} -> host end)}
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|> Enum.into(%{})
|
||||
|> Map.new()
|
||||
|
||||
# This is for backwards compatibility. We originally didn't sent
|
||||
# extra info like a reason why an instance was rejected/quarantined/etc.
|
||||
|
@ -277,12 +279,19 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy do
|
|||
# to add an extra "info" key.
|
||||
mrf_simple_info =
|
||||
mrf_simple_excluded
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, v} -> {k, Enum.reject(v, fn {_, reason} -> reason == "" end)} end)
|
||||
|> Enum.reject(fn {_, v} -> v == [] end)
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, l} ->
|
||||
{k, l |> Enum.map(fn {i, r} -> {i, %{"reason" => r}} end) |> Enum.into(%{})}
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {rule, instances} ->
|
||||
{rule, Enum.reject(instances, fn {_, reason} -> reason == "" end)}
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|> Enum.into(%{})
|
||||
|> Enum.reject(fn {_, instances} -> instances == [] end)
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {rule, instances} ->
|
||||
instances =
|
||||
instances
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {host, reason} -> {host, %{"reason" => reason}} end)
|
||||
|> Map.new()
|
||||
|
||||
{rule, instances}
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|> Map.new()
|
||||
|
||||
{:ok, %{mrf_simple: mrf_simple, mrf_simple_info: mrf_simple_info}}
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.UserAllowListPolicy do
|
|||
def describe do
|
||||
mrf_user_allowlist =
|
||||
Config.get([:mrf_user_allowlist], [])
|
||||
|> Enum.into(%{}, fn {k, v} -> {k, length(v)} end)
|
||||
|> Map.new(fn {k, v} -> {k, length(v)} end)
|
||||
|
||||
{:ok, %{mrf_user_allowlist: mrf_user_allowlist}}
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.VocabularyPolicy do
|
|||
|
||||
@impl true
|
||||
def describe,
|
||||
do: {:ok, %{mrf_vocabulary: Pleroma.Config.get(:mrf_vocabulary) |> Enum.into(%{})}}
|
||||
do: {:ok, %{mrf_vocabulary: Pleroma.Config.get(:mrf_vocabulary) |> Map.new()}}
|
||||
|
||||
@impl true
|
||||
def config_description do
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -95,22 +95,19 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.MastodonAPI.InstanceView do
|
|||
{:ok, data} = MRF.describe()
|
||||
|
||||
data
|
||||
|> Map.merge(%{
|
||||
quarantined_instances:
|
||||
quarantined
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {instance, _reason} -> instance end)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|> Map.put(
|
||||
:quarantined_instances,
|
||||
Enum.map(quarantined, fn {instance, _reason} -> instance end)
|
||||
)
|
||||
# This is for backwards compatibility. We originally didn't sent
|
||||
# extra info like a reason why an instance was rejected/quarantined/etc.
|
||||
# Because we didn't want to break backwards compatibility it was decided
|
||||
# to add an extra "info" key.
|
||||
|> Map.merge(%{
|
||||
quarantined_instances_info: %{
|
||||
"quarantined_instances" =>
|
||||
quarantined
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {instance, reason} -> {instance, %{"reason" => reason}} end)
|
||||
|> Enum.into(%{})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|> Map.put(:quarantined_instances_info, %{
|
||||
"quarantined_instances" =>
|
||||
quarantined
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {instance, reason} -> {instance, %{"reason" => reason}} end)
|
||||
|> Map.new()
|
||||
})
|
||||
else
|
||||
%{}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue